Ref: PF/Cadre Review Dated – 29.05.2012
To
Dr. Salim Haque
DDG (P)
Department of Posts
Dak Bhawan, New Delhi – 110001
Sub: - Cadre Review Proposal
Apropos discussion held on 29.05.2012 on the
above subject, the consolidated proposal from the staff side in respect of
Group ‘B’ Non – Gazetted and Group ‘C’ cadre in operative side Postal
Department is appended herewith.
It is requested to kindly consider the same as
agreed upon in the said meeting cited in para supra.
DA: as above
With kind regards,
K. V. Sridharan D. Kishan Rao
General Secretary General Secretary
AIPEU Group ‘C’
NAPE Group ‘C’
Giriraj Singh
D. Theagarajan
General Secretary General
Secretary
AIRMS & MMS EU Group ‘C’
NURMS & MMS
Group ‘C’
Proposal
for Cadre Review in respect of Group B (Non Gazetted) & Group ‘C’ Cadre in
operative side of Postal Department
JUSTIFICATION FOR CADRE REVIEW
1.1 In the first Chapter of the
Annual report 2007-08 of the Department of Post under the Caption of
'Overview', it was mentioned that the Cadre Review was conducted in 2007 with
the prime aim of restructuring the Cadre to meet the challenges to the
Department, and especially to cater the marketing and business development.
1.2 Whereas the
similar to the cadre review exercised at JAG/SAG level has not been extended to
the grass root level employees who are actually carrying out the policy and
programme of the Postal organisation despite there is ample justification after
the modernisation of postal services and introduction of various new projects
and products. Not even a single post of System Administrators for maintenance
of hardware and software has so far been created despite the posts of Systems
Manager/ Systems Administrators/ Project officers etc. are in existence by
converting the Postal Assistant posts by keeping those posts vacant. Many
Postal Assistant posts were now christened as Marketing Executives without any
monetary benefits and also keeping the Postal Assistants posts vacant which are
being managed by the rest of the staff without any monetary compensation.
1.3 As per the
report cited above in para supra, there is a dire need to transform the human
resources abundantly available in the Department to a multi dimensional one to
meet the challenges and also to improve the services in the competition era for
which the officials should be motivated by offering good packages and
promotional opportunities.
The
Cadre restructuring exercises have been done by the various departments in
large scale. In many departments like Railways, Audit & Accounts, the cadre
restructurings were exercised in Group C cadres many times and the ratio of
promotional avenues between the feeder and promotional cadres are being
maintained under the ratio of 20:80.
The
Staff of the Postal Accounts in our department have also been blessed with this
beneficial scheme of eighty percent upgradation of posts during Sep 87 based on
the cadre restructuring to Postal Accounts staff exercised after the
implementation of the Fourth Pay Commission's recommendations.
So
far, in respect of Postal department, the Postal Board has not exercised any
cadre restructuring to the Clerical (Group C) cadres but has resorted to other
schemes like TBOP, BCR on matching Savings. The conception of TBOP/BCR was to
ensure that an employee does not stagnate in the maximum of the pay scale of
the Cadre and promote to next grade (Selection grade) in two spells (i.e) one
first after 16 years and second after 26years of service. The agreement for TBOP
and BCR were signed by providing matching savings for the schemes to the extent
of 20% in supervisory and 6% in operative Posts and withdrawal of special pay
and so on.
Prior
to introduction of TBOP, in May 1974, by an agreement in the JCM Departmental
Council, 20% of the posts in the operative grade were placed in the next higher
grade of LSG. This was withdrawn at the time of introduction of TBOP, as the
LSG promotions were granted on the length of service of individuals and not by
the existence of posts under the TBOP scheme.
The Department has issued various clarifications on TBOP/BCR and in
almost all the clarifications the TBOP and BCR promotions were equated with LSG
& HSG II. HSG I promotions were accorded during the years in between 1995
to 1998 based on the BCR Gradation list. Suddenly in 1999, the TBOP & BCRs
were termed as financial up gradations and they were denied the equal status
with LSG & HSG II. Thus the benefits arrived after the TBOP/BCR in the
years 1983/1991 were freezed and those promotions were lost its identity and
sanctity. Finally while adopting MACP Promotions the erstwhile TBOP & BCR
Schemes were scrapped and now not in existence. Thus all the three exercises
similar to cadre review in different forms were withdrawn and virtually, it
appears that there is no cadre review for Group C cadre has been exercised so
far.
The
Sixth Pay Commission did not recommend any separate pay scales for LSG &
HSG II and resultantly the Pay Bands applicable to TBOP & BCR are thus
being applied to LSG & HSG II promotions. After equating the TBOP & BCR
with the similar Pay Band to LSG & HSG II, the contention of the Department
that they are financial upgradation is having no relevance. Thus there is ample
justification for exercising cadre restructuring for the supervisory cadres in
the department.
Meanwhile,
the Sixth CPC in its recommendations under para 3.3.17 maintained that it has
refrained from conducting cadre review of individual services and left the job
to the respective departments. Thus we propose the following proposal for cadre
review for consideration.
Since
we are aware that despite ample functional justification for upgradation of
grade pay to the extent of Rs.2800/- to Postal Assistants, there is no chance
of considering to grant higher pay scale to Postal Assistants under the
proposed cadre restructuring, we are restraining ourselves only to the increase
the number of supervisory posts in existence in respect of hierarchical cadre
to the Postal assistants and formation of new cadres pertaining to technical
posts.
It
is pertinent to mention that in many departments, the percentage wise cadre
restructuring of posts were considered and the functional justification has not
been insisted. For example, Railways in the case of Ticket Checking staff who
are in 1900 GP Entry level pay, have been provided with the promotional cadre
like Senior Ticket Examiner; Head Ticket Examiner; and Chief Ticket Inspector.
In the case of Railway Commercial clerks, who are in 2000 GP at Entry level
pay, have promotional cadres like Senior commercial Clerks; Head Commercial
Clerks; and Chief Commercial Clerks under the cadre restructuring doing the
similar duty with different nomenclatures.
Under
the Cadre Restructuring exercised in Railways 14% of officials are retained in
Entry level pay scale of both these cadres; 16% officials in next pay scale
level of 2400 GP; 46% to next level of 4200 GP; and remaining 24% in 4600 GP in
the case of Ticket Checking Staff. Out of these staff most of them work as
operative staff and the senior most staff only are working as Supervisors in
second and third level and only the fourth level are fully real supervisory
staff. According to Railway formula these higher cadre restructured posts were
not based on functional justification. It is the bare fact that on functional
justification basis many could not have obtained this much percentage of higher
level posts.
Even
though, we are of the opinion that the cadre restructuring shall be exercised
at par with railways or at least with the earlier review made for staff car
drivers based on the percentage of posts in basic cadre to each promotional
categories, we are placing below the availability of functional justification
also in case of PA cadre for kind information and consideration..
LSG, HSG II/HSG I
2.1 At the outset, we wish to place on record that the existing
nomenclature for supervisory posts viz. LSG, HSG-II & HSG-I does not
exhibit the nature of status to our world and it requires revision. Let it be
called with the nomenclature of Supervisors, Senior Supervisors and Chief
Supervisors or Executive Manager, Senior Manager, and Chief Manager. It is most
opt to mention that the earlier station masters are now called as station
managers; Engine drivers are now called as Loco Pilot; Group D is now called as
Multi Tasked Staff; Mechanics sheds are called as care centres. Similarly, the
Postal Assistant shall also be called with decent nomenclature instead of this
present LSG, HSG II & HSG I
2.2 The Supervisors/Postmasters have omnibus task of management,
providing guidance and supervision in all activities including the various
marketing/business activities.
2.3 The scope and functions of Postmasters/Supervisors may broadly be
categorised as follows.
They are
responsible for drawal/remittance of funds involving huge financial
responsibility.
They have
to enforce efficient supervision office and Postal operations.
They have
to enforce the orders strictly in maintaining the office and its day to day
functions.
They have
to plan and execute the orders and promote more business and improve the mail
functioning.
They have
to supervise the subordinates as on administrator and in some cases act as
disciplinary authority also.
They
should possess a through knowledge on all Postal transactions with updated
rulings in order to run the office smoothly with the customer satisfaction.
They have
to take all efforts for prompt delivery of mails besides averting any public
complaints.
They have a
thorough knowledge about their powers, responsibilities, and duties and also to
acquaint him with all departmental rules and procedures
Under the changed scenario, due to complete modernisation and venturing
various business activities, the role and responsibilities of the supervisors
and postmasters become abundant and there is a dire need to place them in
higher pay band of II right from LSG post onwards.
2.4 In nutshell,
they should function as a Manager, Public Relation Officer, Bank Officer,
Welfare Officer and also a good Administrator. Based on the job content, the
responsibilities and specialised knowledge needed for efficient functioning;
there is a sound case for upgradation of all the posts of Postmasters into
supervisory cadre. After the decentralisation of various works at S. O. levels
like RD/MIS works and launching various business activities there is a
qualitative change in the supervisory duties of the Single/Double handed
offices which require a better senior officials to supervise the work.
Notwithstanding our claim to place the LSG in pay band II with grade pay of
Rs.4200; HSG II to Rs.4600 & HSG I to Rs.4800, We are proposing the
following for increase the number of supervisory posts which will cater the
need and also based on the functional justification.
2.5 The
Department is having a total number of Postal Assistants to the extent of
83,696 Posts. We are having 6989 LSG Posts, 1703 HSG II & 1649 HSG I Posts;
out of which 2097 post of Postmaster Grade I, 511 posts of Grade II Postmaster
& 495 posts of Grade I Postmaster were carved out while forming a separate
cadre of Postmaster. While comparing the existence of basic cadre Postal Assistants,
the present number of LSG Posts is just only 8.35%. Even the assured 20%
operative posts in LSG during May 74 and implemented is no where in letter
& spirit and we have gone back to the period prior to 1974.
2.6
The staff side therefore requests to consider the following proposals in the
case of supervisors.
Considering
the more nature of supervisory works now available in B & C Class offices,
the posts of SPMs of those offices may be upgraded to the present status of LSG
with the revised nomenclature of 'Supervisor' or Manager. As on date we are
having 11395 singled handed post offices and 6719 double handed offices. It
will result in creation of new supervisory posts equivalent to present LSG
cadre to be extent of 18114 which will work out to 21.65% LSG Supervisory
posts.
The
SPMs working in present 'A' class and LSG offices & other LSG supervisory
posts may be upgraded to the present status of HSG II and called them as
'Senior Supervisor or Senior Manager'. This will add to the present LSG
strength of 6989 with addition of 3732 postmaster of Triple handed post offices
with the total strength of 10718 which will maintain the promotional avenues
from LSG to HSG II to the extent ratio of 2 : 1.
The
present posts in HSG II & HSG I may be amalgamated and called as 'Chief
Supervisor or Chief Manager' with the present HSG I status. The existing posts
of HSG II & HSG I to the extent of 1703 and 1649 posts respectively (i.e.)
3352 posts will maintain the ratio of promotions from HSG II to HSG I as 3:1
A
separate identification to the extent of 30% of the HSG I posts may please be
accorded as Non functional posts in Group B status with grade pay of Rs. 4800/-
in Pay Band II.
If the above process of elevation
of more supervisory posts considering the requirement of more supervisory posts
on functional justification is carried out, it will provide more supervisory
posts and not to have any disturbances in the pyramidal structure since the
total no. of supervisory posts will work out to 32184 which is 38.45% not
exceeding 40% of the basic cadre.
POSTMASTER’S
CADRE
3.1 The Department has
unilaterally introduced Postmaster’s Cadre vide its No. 4-17/2008-SPB II dt.
22.11.2010 by carving out 2097 LSG posts, 511 HSG II posts and 495 HSG I posts
out of 5695 LSG posts, 1077 HSG II & 1176 HSG I posts. The staff side was
not in favour for formation of separate cadre since it will create a division
among the existing supervisors and also the concept of supervisors to know all
the nature of work is being shrinking due to separate formation. However, the
Postmaster cadre is being implemented as a separate hierarchical cadre.
3.2 The recruitment rules
applicable to other supervisors are being applied in respect of Postmasters
cadre. During cadre restructuring the following shall be considered.
When the Postmaster cadre is
separately created, all the promotions up to the posts of Chief Postmaster
shall be open only to that cadre. Entertaining IPO line officials is not fair.
Their option may be obtained for postmaster cadre if willing. Thereafter all
posts shall be filled up only from the Postmasters cadre.
At the time of upgradation of
more supervisory posts under cadre review, 1/3rd posts may also be
carved out for the postmasters cadre.
At present there is no
provision to fill up the Postmaster Grade I posts on seniority. The principle
of 2/3rd by Seniority and 1/3rd by merit shall be
introduced in Postmasters Grade-I also.
4. RMS
4.1 At present, there are 7599
Sorting Assistants; 5544 MACP II SAs & 3311 MACP III. Whereas the present
supervisory posts available in the RMS in LSG 1053; HSG II 415; HSG-I 415,
which is not even reaches 5% in LSG to the comparison of Sorting Assistant
4.2 After implementation of
mail network redesign in speed post as well as First class mailing offices and
there are vast changes being taken place, more promotional avenues shall be
provided in RMS. Considering the above, more Promotional Posts in LSG, HSG-II
& HSG-I equal to the ratio provided to Postal Assistant under the cadre
review may please be considered, the existing promotional Posts shall be
increased at least by three times.
4.3 Further a new cadre of Non
Functional Group ‘B’ may please be carved out to the extend of 30% of the total
HSG I Posts by providing one NFS Posts to each RMS division for effective
supervision and monitoring.
5. SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATORS
5.1 The Sixth
Pay Commission in its report vide item No. 7.6.21 observed interalia: -
"Postal
Assistants assigned the jobs of Systems Administrators and Marketing Executives
have demanded creation of a new cadre with higher pay scales. Creation of a new
cadre in their case is not functionally justified. The commission, in any case,
is not looking into demands relating to individual cadre reviews, status -quo
may, therefore, need to be maintained especially because the existing scenario
always usage of available manpower for need based multifarious function."
5.2 The Sixth
CPC did not dealt the issue with due note of the existence of such category in
postal exclusively performing the duties properly and arrived at the conclusion
causing severe discontentment in the minds of the officials who are toiling
since inception of computers in the post offices and rendered their unstinted
service without any extra remuneration for the total computerisation of postal
services.
From the report of the Sixth
CPC, it is quite evident that the actual nature of work involved as 'Systems
Administrators' in the Department of Posts has been quite misunderstood and the
projection of the same has been made devoid of the acumen and dexterity
actually involved. In nut shell, the work of 'Systems Administrators' has been
evaluated on facts that are miles away from the ground realities. In other
departments, the nature of work entrusted to Systems administrators are quite
different and they are being with the grade pay of Rs.5400. Here we are calling
them as systems administrators; but their role and responsibilities are
entirely different.
In certain departments, the
posts of ‘Computer Assistant’ or ‘System Assistant’ in the pay scale of Rs.
9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs. 4200/- have been created with the
Qualification of graduation/BSC with PGDCA/DOEACC – A level with 55/- marks or
two years’ experience is required for the selection as system assistant. The
nature of work in existence in postal can be equated with that of systems
assistants. Based on the same structure, a separate cadre of system
Administrators can be created by providing further promotional avenues in the
cadre.
The Department has formed a
separate Technical wing at the Directorate to deal the problems of Systems
oriented and it has given a hope that the long pending demands of the System
Administrators would also be considered and decided. The Department has also
constituted another three DDG Committee vide is letter No.1/1/2010-Sr dated
19.7.2010 comprising DDG (Estt), DDG (P) and DDG (Technology) to consider about
creation of systems administrators cadre and directed to submit its report
within three months. We are not aware of the recommendations of the committee.
Further, the Department of
Posts vide its letter No. 23-15/2004-PE II dt 24.12.04, after the formation of
Separate Committee under the Chairmanship of the DDG (Technology) directed to
consider the following: -
Assess which of
special categories of Staff will be required at Sub Post offices, Head Post
offices, Sorting offices, Speed Post centres as and various Administrative and
Accounts offices to effectively tackle problems which arise while implementing
the Computerization plan:
Assess number of
Staff in each of these special categories that will be required in
SOs/HOs/Divisions etc and nomenclature (for example, PAC Technology). System
administrator, Systems Manager etc.) for each category.
Recommend:
Pay
scales to be given to such staff
Selection
criterion for such staff and career
Career
progression for such staff.
The Director
(T&E) has sought views and suggestions on the above vide his letter cited
above. However, it seems no decision has so far been taken by the committee or
Department.
According
to Para 10.1 of the Annual report of 2010-11 of the Department of Posts, during
the period from 1st April 2010 to 31st December 2010 ,
computer hardware and peripherals have been supplied to 1811 post offices. Thus
till December 2010, 14415 post offices have been computerised under Plan Scheme
of Computerisation of Post offices. Further all Postal Circle Offices, Regional
Offices, all Postal Accounts Offices and 1205 Divisional Offices have also been
computerized. Besides, a number of enabled services were started in these post
offices. The Govt has approved IT modernisation project of the Department of
Posts for computerisation of all the non-computerised post offices, mail
offices, administrative and other offices, establishment of required IT
infrastructure, development of required software applications to be completed
by 2012-13. .
The
Department has entered with contracts for implementation of financial services
solution and there are eight projects for the I.T. modernisation of India Post
at on overall out lay of Rs.1877 crores. As per the contract for financial
services solution, it includes commissioning of Postal Banking operations
entailing core banking solution and ATM switch. The dept proposes to introduce
and install Rural ICT hardware devices and providing network connectivity to
1.30 lakhs branch post offices enabling all post offices to perform e
transactions.
It is very
pertinent to point out that this could be achieved only by having specialised
and trained man power pool inside our organisation. Imparting training,
maintenance of hardware and software, attending faults at 1.30 lakhs branch
post offices etc, we require a large number of expert personnel for which the
creation of systems assistant or call by any name like Technical Assistant,
Computer Assistant etc is inevitable. The role of existing Systems
Administrators in total computerisation of Post offices must be recognised.
They are very much frustrated and the discontentment is mounting due to the
continuous exploitation of these categories over ten years.
It is therefore requested to
consider their plights and convert the existing Systems Administrator posts as
Promotional Cadre to Postal Assistants possessing required qualification in
computer appreciations as if available in other departments for the post of
Systems Assistant with grade pay of Rs.4200.
The existing Systems
Administrators may be absorbed in the promotional posts by conducting simple
Trade test in token of recognition of their services in the past in the total
computerisation of post offices. It is pertinent to mention that it is only the
postal department, the computerisation to this extent possible without engaging
any outside agencies and also without incurring more expenses with the
technically qualified Postal Assistants available in the department. They must
be recognised by this way.
The pay scale of the Systems
Assistants may be decided as follows.
Systems
Assistants - Grade Pay 4200
I
Promotion: Systems Manager - Grade Pay 4600
II
Promotion: Sr. System Manager - Grade Pay 4800
10% posts may be
identified as Gazetted with Grade pay of Rs.5400/- as existence in other
departments as Systems Administrators for monitoring the entire Technical
developments.
5.14 Even though all the supervisory
posts in Postal operative side can look after the postmasters work and there is
no need for creation of separate cadre, the Dept has created the Postmasters
cadre recently which the staff side not resisted. Whereas
in
the case of Systems assistants, there is ample justification for creation of
separate cadre considering the nature of their duties and requirement to the
service and this may be considered in true spirit.
Notwithstanding
our demand for the creation of System Asst. With Rs. 4200/- Grade Pay, it is
agreeable to convert the Posts by LSG and other hierarchical promotions based
on the functional requirements and declare it as a promotional cadre to Postal
Assistants.
6. PO & RMS ACCOUNTANTS
The Sixth Pay Commission has
rejected higher pay scale to PO & RMS Accountants as if there is no
functional justification exists for the same and recommended to revise the
special allowance of Rs.180/- in double the rates. The description of the Sixth
CPC that they are not belonging to the organised accounts cadre without looking
the merits through their nature of duties and responsibilities are nothing but
a farce. This cadre has met a raw deal over the last three decades.
The
comparative pay structure of Accountant post in different Department / Ministry
/ organized Sector are detailed below for kind perusal.
Name of the
Department Designation / Existing pay scale after 5th CPC/ Revised
pay scale
Indian Audit
& Accounts
(a)Auditor/Accountant 4500-125-7000
Department/ subsequently revised to 5000-150-8000
(b) Sr Auditor/ Accountant 5500-175-900 (Para
7.56.4 6th CPC) (c) Section Officer 6500-200-10500
Railway
Department (a) Accountants Assistants 5000-150-8000
(Para 7.56.6 6th
CPC) (b) Divisional Accountant 5500-175-9000
Ministry of
Consumer Affairs (a) Accountant cum cashier 5000-150-8000
Food &
Public Dn (b) on promotion 5500-175-9000
(Para 7.1.14 6th
CPC) (c) -DO- 6500-200-10500
The Survey of
India Land & (a) Accountant 5000-150-8000
Development
Office (b) On Promotion 5500-175-9000
(Para 7.46.41 6th
CPC) (c) -DO- 6500-200-10500
Indian Tourism
Office (a) Accountant 4500-125-7000
(Para 7.44.7 6th
CPC)
Postal A/Cs
& Finance (a) Auditor / Accountant 5000-150-8000
(Para 7.56 6th
CPC) (b) Sr. Auditor/Accountant 5500-175-9000
(c) Section
Officer 6500-200-10500
This will
be the testimony that this cadre of PO & RMS Accountant alone is deprived
and denied the dues. The exploitation of this cadre is continuing over 20
years. This may please be pursued with the Government and see that the PO &
RMS Accountants are placed at least with the Accountants working in Postal
Accounts office of our department.
The
following is the proposal, we desired to put forth for kind consideration
i. The Po & RMS Accountant examination may be declared as vacancy
based examination instead of the present qualified one
i i. The official after their selection shall be posted as Accountant
with the Grade Pay of Rs.2800.
iii. PO & RMS Accountants cadre shall be declared as a separate
cadre with hierarchical promotional benefits.
iv. At the time of upgradation of 1622 HSG II posts to HSG I, many APM
accounts LSG posts were identified as HSG I posts. Resultantly there is very
lesser number of LSG Posts ie. in the feeder cadre available for promotion to
PO & RMS Accountants. This has blocked the promotional chances for the
existing PO &RMS Accountants .In many places, the due DPC for LSG posts
could not held due to dearth of LSG vacancies. Hence, it is the dire need to
restore the LSG position to the extent of 50% of the total posts of APM
Accounts by upgrading simultaneously in the general line posts. Those posts can
be identified to the present status of HSG II with Grade pay of Rs.4200.
v. 30% of the remaining APM Accounts post may be declared with present
HSG I status with grade pay of Rs.4600.
vi. The
remaining 20% of the APM Accounts posts may be declared as Gazetted posts with
grade
pay of Rs.4800.
The
determination of status on LSG, HSG II, HSGI and Gazetted may be decided based
on the status of the offices and also the supervisory nature of the posts. This
is possible. The nomenclature of the posts may also be changed at par with the
proposals we suggested for the supervisory posts. Unless the cadre is declared
as a separate one, the anomalies in existence over three decades will continue.
It is therefore requested to consider the proposals by analysing all these
factors prevailing in the work spot.
7. MISCELLANEOUS
7.1 In order to provide more promotional avenues to
the youth possessing more skills & qualifications, the following
establishments may be upgraded and elevated to the standards of supervisors.
The
Marketing Executives may also be declared as promotional supervisory posts as
is done in the case of Town Inspectors in to LSG.
8. CIRCLE OFFICE STAFF
The
present staff strength in circle offices available in Group ‘C’ is around 2500
and the existing promotional avenues is less than 8% in total and after
conversion of LDC & UDC as single cadre of Postal Assistant, there is a
total imbalance in respect of Circle office in respect of promotional posts.
It is
therefore suggested that in promotional cadres like LSG, HSG II & HSG I may
be created as in the same ratio of Postal Assistant and 30% as the HSG-I posts
may be upgraded as NFS. The existing four posts of Group ‘B’ may please be
merged with the other Group ‘B’ posts in officer’s line.
9.
SBCO Staff
9-1 Total staff is 4100. There is no HSG II at
present. It is suggested to provide four layers of promotions with the ratio of
50:20:20; 5:5. The SBCO in charge of All Gazetted HPOs (116) may be converted
to HSG I. There are 442 divisions and all the in charge of such divisional head
quarters may be considered for HSG II. It is further suggested that the in
charge of SBCO having up to 50,000 entries may be converted to LSG, above
50,000 up to 100000 may be HSG II and above 1 lakh, it will be HSG-I, Similarly
all working in (PWCs/ICOs shall be placed in promotional posts. The ration in
promotional prospects as decided in case of Postal Assistant may please be
rotational in case of PA SBCO also.
10. MATCHING SAVINGS
10.1 The question of matching savings does not arise since in most of
the cadre, as there is no elevation in the pay scale, the officials who have
already acquired the pay pertaining to the post shall alone get regular
promotion.
10.2 The matching savings, we offered for TBOP/BCR
have not been practically restored despite the Directorate orders 25-5/2010-PE
I dt. 19.7.2010 since there is no chance of any new creation. As per the norms
and after withdrawing the reduction of staff under TBOP/BCR Schemes w.e.f
1.9.2008, there is ample justification for creation of more new posts. As such,
further matching savings in the shape of staff cut will ruin the developmental
activities and efficiency of the postal services.
10.3 In token of acceptance of modernisation and various re
organisations in the Postal set up, the officials shall be offered with more
promotional avenues despite it will not cause any monetary benefits.
It
is therefore requested that the proposal for cadre review may please be
considered with due attention and the Group C employees may be granted with the
promotional avenues. Satisfied Employees will perform well and render more
satisfied work.
K. V. Sridharan D. Kishan Rao
General
Secretary
General Secretary
AIPEU
Group ‘C’
NAPE Group ‘C’
Giriraj
Singh
D. Theagarajan
General Secretary
General Secretary
AIRMS & MMS
EU Group ‘C’ NURMS & MMS Group ‘C’
No comments:
Post a Comment